How do electronic word of mouth practices contribute to mobile banking adoption ?

Amit Shankara, Charles Jebarajakirthyb, Md Ashaduzzamanb, (2020), How do electronic word of mouth practices contribute to mobile banking adoption ? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

Mot clefs : Mobile banking ;Electronic ; word of mouth ; Elaboration likelihood model ; Moderated mediation ;Initial trust.

 Amit Shankara, Charles Jebarajakirthyb et Md Ashaduzzamanb demontrent l’importance du “electronic word-of-mouth” soit l’équivalent du « bouche à oreille électronique » dans le secteur du commerce en ligne. Ce processus fait référence à une recommandation orale ou écrite d’un client satisfait à d’autres clients potentiels.Le secteur du service bancaire mobile est mis en avant dans cette étude, du fait que nous sommes dans un ère ou le service en ligne connait un croissance d’autant plus accrue ces dernières années, mais il est aussi un des modèles les plus rentable.

Développement :

L’objectif principal de cette étude est d’analyser le mécanisme de médiation pour améliorer le comportement d’adoption de la banque mobile. Bien que l’influence des déclencheurs eWOM sur l’intention d’achat ou d’adoption ait été étudiée dans le contexte d’autres produits ou services, la littérature ne montre pas comment les déclencheurs eWOM positifs affectent l’intention d’adoption par l’achat ou l’adoption. L’ensemble des données analysées est basé sur un total de 1153 enquêtes. Ce type d’échange d’informations de personne à personne affecte la prise de décision des consommateurs et met en lumière l’importance de la stratégie marketing pour motiver les individus à avoir confiance et à se fidéliser à ces services en ligne. En effet, le WOM a un meilleur impact sur les ventes de produits et la crédibilité des services car il est personnel et authentique,  et fourni par les personnes qui ont utilisé le produit ou le service.

En ce sens, avec l’avènement d’Internet, le bouche à oreille est devenu un sujet considérable ces dernières années. Les principes de base comme la qualité du service induite par une facilité de gestion de ses activités financières en ligne, sans contraintes de temps et de lieu notamment, le prix, la sécurité et la confiance (facteurs techniques principaux), la cohérence sont considérés comme des variables ayant une relation directe les unes entre elles, qui déclenchent le WOM.

 Conclusion :

Les résultats ont montré que parmi les déclencheurs eWOM, les arguments de qualité, de puissance et de cohérence augmentent considérablement la volonté d’adopter la banque mobile en ligne. La confiance initiale sert d’intermédiaire entre ces déclencheurs eWOM et l’intention d’adopter les services bancaires mobiles.

Cette étude fournit des suggestions aux banques sur la manière d’utiliser l’eWOM actif pour motiver les consommateurs à adopter les services bancaires mobiles.

 

Références bibliographiques

Aboelmaged, M., Gebba, T.R., 2013. Mobile banking adoption: an examination of tech- nology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Biol. Res. Dev. 2 (1), 35–50.

Amed, I., Berg, A., Brantberg, L., Hedrich, S., Leon, J., Young, R., 2017. The State of Fashion 2017, New York.

Akturan, U., Tezcan, N., 2012. Mobile banking adoption of the youth market: perceptions and intentions. Market. Intell. Plan. 30 (4), 444–459.

Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., 2017. Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: extending UTAUT2 with trust. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37 (3), 99–110.

Augusto, M., Torres, P., 2018. Effects of brand attitude and eWOM on consumers’ will- ingness to pay in the banking industry: mediating role of consumer-brand identifi- cation and brand equity. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 42, 1–10.

Berezina, K., Bilgihan, A., Cobanoglu, C., Okumus, F., 2016. Understanding satisfied and dissatisfied hotel customers: text mining of online hotel reviews. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 25 (1), 1–24.

Bhattacherjee, A., Sanford, C., 2006. Influence processes for information technology ac- ceptance: an elaboration likelihood model. MIS Q. 30 (4), 805–825.

Byrne, B.M., 2009. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis, New York, NY.

Bronner, F., de Hoog, R., 2016. Travel websites: changing visits, evaluations and posts. Ann. Tourism Res. 57, 94–112.

Bryman, A., 2012. Social Research Methods, fourth ed. Oxford University Press, New York.

Burns, A.C., Bush, R.F., 2003. Marketing Research, fourth ed. Pearson Education, Upper

Saddle River, NJ.

Canhoto, A.I., Clark, M., 2013. Customer service 140 characters at a time: the users’

perspective. J. Mark. Manag. 29 (5–6), 522–544.

Chan, Y.Y., Ngai, E.W., 2011. Conceptualising electronic word of mouth activity: an

input-process-output perspective. Market. Intell. Plan. 29 (5), 488–516.

Chaouali, W., Souiden, N., 2019. The role of cognitive age in explaining mobile banking

resistance among elderly people. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 50, 342–350.

Cheah, C.M., Teo, A.C., Sim, J.J., Oon, K.H., Tan, B.I., 2011. Factors affecting Malaysian mobile banking adoption: an empirical analysis. Int. J. Network Mob. Technol. 2 (3),

149–160.

Chemingui, H., Ben lallouna, H., 2013. Resistance, motivations, trust and intention to use

mobile financial services. Int. J. Bank Mark. 31 (7), 574–592.

Chen, P.Y., Wu, S.Y., Yoon, J., 2004. The impact of online recommendations and con-

sumer feedback on sales. In: ICIS 2004 Proceedings, pp. 711–724.

Chen, J., Teng, L., Yu, Y., Yu, X., 2016. The effect of online information sources on purchase intentions between consumers with high and low susceptibility to in-

formational influence. J. Bus. Res. 69 (2), 467–475.

Cheung, C.M., Lee, M.K., 2012. What drives consumers to spread electronic word of

mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decis. Support Syst. 53 (1), 218–225. Cheung, C.M., Thadani, D.R., 2012. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth commu- nication: a literature analysis and integrative model. Decis. Support Syst. 54 (1),

461–470.

Cheung, C.M., Lee, M.K., Thadani, D.R., 2009. The impact of positive electronic word-of-

mouth on consumer online purchasing decision. In: World Summit on Knowledge

Society, pp. 501–510.

Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D., 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book

reviews. J. Mark. Res. 43 (3), 345–354.

Cheung, G.W., Lau, R.S., 2008. Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent var-

iables:bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organ. Res. Methods 11 (2),

296–325.

Chu, S.C., Kim, Y., 2011. Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-

mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. Int. J. Advert. 30 (1), 47–75. Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X.M., Awad, N.F., 2007. Exploring the value of online product

reviews in forecasting sales: the case of motion pictures. J. Interact. Mark. 21 (4),

23–45.

Delone, W.H., McLean, E.R., 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems

success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19 (4), 9–30.

Deutskens, E., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., 2006. An assessment of equivalence between

online and mail surveys in service research. J. Serv. Res. 8 (4), 346–355. Dichter, E., 1966. How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harv. Bus. Rev. 44 (6),

147–160.

Doh, S.J., Hwang, J.S., 2009. How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth)

messages. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 12 (2), 193–197.

Duan, W., Gu, B., Whinston, A.B., 2008. Do online reviews matter?-An empirical in-

vestigation of panel data. Decis. Support Syst. 45 (4), 1007–1016.

Duffy, B., Smith, K., Terhanian, G., Bremer, J., 2005. Comparing data from online and

face-to-face surveys. Int. J. Mark. Res. 47 (6), 615–639.

Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S., 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

College Publishers, Orlando, FL, US.

Erkan, I., Evans, C., 2016. The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase

intentions: an extended approach to information adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61,

47–55.

Filieri, R., McLeay, F., 2014. E-WOM and accommodation: an analysis of the factors that

influence travelers’ adoption of information from online reviews. J. Travel Res. 53

(1), 44–57.

Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H.Y., Freling, T., 2014. How online product re-

views affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. J. Retail. 90 (2), 217–232.

Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable

variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18 (1), 39–50.

Giovanis, A., Athanasopoulou, P., Assimakopoulos, C., Sarmaniotis, C., 2019. Adoption of

mobile banking services: a comparative analysis of four competing theoretical

models. Int. J. Bank Mark. 37 (5), 1165–1189.

Glavee-Geo, R., Shaikh, A.A., Karjaluoto, H., 2017. Mobile banking services adoption in

Pakistan: are there gender differences? Int. J. Bank Mark. 35 (7), 1090–1114. Gopinath, S., Thomas, J.S., Krishnamurthi, L., 2014. Investigating the relationship be- tween the content of online word of mouth, advertising, and brand performance.

Mark. Sci. 33 (2), 241–258.

Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Babin, B.J., Black, W.C., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis: A

Global Perspective, vol. 7 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Hayes, A.F., 2012. PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable med-

iation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. White paper. http://www.

afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G., Gremler, D.D., 2004. Electronic word‐of‐-

mouth via consumer‐opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate

themselves on the internet? J. Interact. Mark. 18 (1), 38–52.

Herold, K., Tarkiainen, A., Sundqvist, S., 2016. How the source of word-of-mouth influ-

ences information processing in the formation of brand attitudes. J. Mark. High.

Educ. 26 (1), 64–85.

Jebarajakirthy, C., Lobo, A., Hewege, C., 2015. Enhancing youth’s attitudes towards

microcredit in the bottom of the pyramid markets. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 39 (2),

180–192.

Junglas, I., Watson, R.T., 2006. The u-constructs: four information drives. Commun.

Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17 (1), 569–592.

Juniper Research, 2013. Mobile banking handset and tablet market strategies 2013–2017.

http://www.juniperresearch.com/reports/mobile_banking.

Kalinic, Z., Marinkovic, V., Molinillo, S., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., 2019. A multi-analytical

12

  1. Shankar, et al.

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 52 (2020) 101920

approach to peer-to-peer mobile payment acceptance prediction. J. Retail. Consum.

Serv. 49, 143–153.

Kim, D.J., Ferrin, D.L., Rao, H.R., 2009. Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for

successful e-commerce relationships: a longitudinal exploration. Inf. Syst. Res. 20 (2),

237–257.

Kim, W.G., Lim, H., Brymer, R.A., 2015. The effectiveness of managing social media on

hotel performance. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 44, 165–171.

Ko, E., Kim, E.Y., Lee, E.K., 2009. Modeling consumer adoption of mobile shopping for

fashion products in Korea. Psychol. Mark. 26 (7), 669–687.

Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., Moll, A., 2010. Predicting young consumers’ take up of

mobile banking services. Int. J. Bank Mark. 28 (5), 410–432.

Koksal, M.H., 2016. The intentions of Lebanese consumers to adopt mobile banking. Int.

  1. Bank Mark. 34 (3), 327–346.

Krishnamurthy, A., Kumar, S.R., 2018. Electronic word-of-mouth and the brand image:

exploring the moderating role of involvement through a consumer expectations lens.

  1. Retail. Consum. Serv. 43, 149–156.

Kudeshia, C., Kumar, A., 2017. Social eWOM: does it affect the brand attitude and pur-

chase intention of brands? Manag. Res. Rev. 40 (3), 310–330.

Ladhari, R., Michaud, M., 2015. eWOM effects on hotel booking intentions, attitudes,

trust, and website perceptions. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 46, 36–45.

Laukkanen, T., 2016. Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: the case of the Internet and mobile banking. J. Bus. Res. 69 (7),

2432–2439.

Lee, S.H., 2009. How do online reviews affect purchasing intention? Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 3

(10), 576–581.

Lee, K.C., Chung, N., 2009. Understanding factors affecting trust in and satisfaction with

mobile banking in Korea: a modified DeLone and McLean’s model perspective.

Interact. Comput. 21 (5–6), 385–392.

Lee, J., Lee, J.N., 2009. Understanding the product information inference process in

electronic word-of-mouth: an objectivity–subjectivity dichotomy perspective. Inf.

Manag. 46 (5), 302–311.

Lee, M., Youn, S., 2009. Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) How eWOM platforms in-

fluence consumer product judgement. Int. J. Advert. 28 (3), 473–499.

Lee, J., Park, D.H., Han, I., 2008. The effect of negative online consumer reviews on

product attitude: an information processing view. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 7 (3),

341–352.

Lee, M., Rodgers, S., Kim, M., 2009. Effects of valence and extremity of eWOM on attitude

toward the brand and website. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 31 (2), 1–11.

Li, X., Hitt, L.M., 2008. Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inf.

Syst. Res. 19 (4), 456–474.

Liao, Z., Shi, X., 2017. Web functionality, web content, information security, and online

tourism service continuance. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 39, 258–263.

Lin, H.F., 2011. An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: the effect of

innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 31 (3), 252–260. Liu, Y., 2006. Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue.

  1. Mark. 70 (3), 74–89.

Liu, C., Arnett, K.P., 2000. Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the

context of electronic commerce. Inf. Manag. 38 (1), 23–33.

Luo, Q., Zhong, D., 2015. Using social network analysis to explain communication

characteristics of travel-related electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites.

Tour. Manag. 46, 274–282.

Luo, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., Shim, J.P., 2010. Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-

faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: an empirical study of

mobile banking services. Decis. Support Syst. 49 (2), 222–234.

Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., Patil, A., 2006. Common method variance in IS research: a

comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manag. Sci.

52 (12), 1865–1883.

Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V.K., 2004. Mobile banking services. Commun. ACM 47

(5), 42–46.

Matute, J., Polo-Redondo, Y., Utrillas, A., 2016. The influence of EWOM characteristics

on online repurchase intention: mediating roles of trust and perceived usefulness.

Online Inf. Rev. 40 (7), 1090–1110.

Mills, L.A., Knezek, G., Khaddage, F., 2014. Information Seeking, Information Sharing,

and going mobile: three bridges to informal learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 32,

324–334.

Mullan, J., Bradley, L., Loane, S., 2017. Bank adoption of mobile banking: stakeholder

perspective. Int. J. Bank Mark. 35 (7), 1154–1174.

Mo Kwon, J., Bae, J.I., Blum, S.C., 2013. Mobile applications in the hospitality industry. J.

Hospit. Tourism Technol. 4 (1), 81–92.

Mortazavi, M., Rahim Esfidani, M., Shaemi Barzoki, A., 2014. Influencing VSN users’

purchase intentions: the roles of flow, trust and eWOM. J. Res. Indian Med. 8 (2),

102–123.

Moser, F., 2015. Mobile banking: a fashionable concept or an institutionalized channel in

future retail banking? Analyzing patterns in the practical and academic mobile

banking literature. Int. J. Bank Mark. 33 (2), 162–177.

Muller, D., Judd, C.M., Yzerbyt, V.Y., 2005. When moderation is mediated and mediation

is moderated. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 89 (6), 852–863.

Muskat, M., Muskat, B., Zehrer, A., Johns, R., 2013. Generation Y: evaluating services

experiences through mobile ethnography. Tour. Rev. 68 (3), 55–71.

Park, D.H., Lee, J., 2008. eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 7 (4), 386–398. Park, C., Lee, T.M., 2009. Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: a

moderating role of product type. J. Bus. Res. 62 (1), 61–67.

Park, D.H., Lee, J., Han, I., 2007. The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer

purchasing intention: the moderating role of involvement. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 11 (4), 125–148.

Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., 1983. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: application to advertising. Advert. Consum. Psychol. 1, 3–23.

Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., 1984. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and peripheral routes to persuasion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 46 (1), 69–81.

Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Communication and Persuasion. Springer, New York.

Pitta, D.A., Fowler, D., 2005. Online consumer communities and their value to new product developers. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 14 (5), 283–291.

Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W., 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12 (4), 531–544.

Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D., Hayes, A.F., 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hy- potheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar. Behav. Res. 42 (1), 185–227.

Premazzi, K., 2010. Trust in online customer-firm interaction: a literature review and directions for research. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 14, 63–91.

Premazzi, K., Castaldo, S., Grosso, M., Raman, P., Brudvig, S., Hofacker, C.F., 2010. Customer information sharing with e-vendors: the roles of incentives and trust. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 14 (3), 63–91.

Richins, M.L., 1983. Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: a pilot study. J. Mark. 47 (1), 68–78.

Robson, C., 2011. Real World Research, third ed. Wiley, UK.

Roy, G., Datta, B., Basu, R., 2017. Effect of eWOM valence on online retail sales. Glob.

Bus. Rev. 18 (1), 198–209.

Ruiz-Mafe, C., Chatzipanagiotou, K., Curras-Perez, R., 2018. The role of emotions and

conflicting online reviews on consumers’ purchase Intentions. J. Bus. Res. 89,

336–344.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., 2009. Research Methods for Business Students.

Pearson education, Essex.

See-To, E.W., Ho, K.K., 2014. Value co-creation and purchase intention in social network

sites: the role of electronic Word-of-Mouth and trust–A theoretical analysis. Comput.

Hum. Behav. 31, 182–189.

Sen, S., Lerman, D., 2007. Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative

consumer reviews on the web. J. Interact. Mark. 21 (4), 76–94.

Shaikh, A.A., Karjaluoto, H., 2015. Mobile banking adoption: a literature review.

Telematics Inf. 32 (1), 129–142.

Shankar, A., Jebarajakirthy, C., 2019. The influence of e-banking service quality on

customer loyalty: a moderated mediation approach. Int. J. Bank Mark. 37 (5),

1119–1142.

Shankar, A., Kumari, P., 2016. Factors affecting mobile banking adoption behavior in

India. J. Internet Bank. Commer. 21 (1), 1–24.

Shareef, M.A., Baabdullah, A., Dutta, S., Kumar, V., Dwivedi, Y.K., 2018. Consumer

adoption of mobile banking services: an empirical examination of factors according

to adoption stages. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 43, 54–67.

Singh, S., Srivastava, R.K., 2018. Predicting the intention to use mobile banking in India.

Int. J. Bank Mark. 36 (2), 357–378.

Sigala, M., Evangelos, C., Ulrike, G., 2012. Social Media in Travel, Tourism and

Hospitality: Theory, Practice and Cases. Ashgate, UK.

Soares, A.M., Pinho, J.C., Nobre, H., 2012. From social to marketing interactions: the role

of social networks. J. Transnatl. Manag. 17 (1), 45–62.

Sreejesh, S., Anusree, M.R., Mitra, A., 2016. Effect of information content and form on

customers’ attitude and transaction intention in mobile banking Moderating role of

perceived privacy concern. Int. J. Bank Mark. 34 (7), 1092–1113.

Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M.G., Mayer, D.M., Saltz, J.L., Niles-Jolly, K., 2005. Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. Acad. Manag. J. 48 (6), 1017–1032. Steffes, E.M., Burgee, L.E., 2009. Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Res. 19

(1), 42–59.

Stewart, D., 2009. Say hello to mobile banking. ABA Bank. Mark. 41 (5), 16–23. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., 2012. Using Multivariate Statistics, sixth ed. Pearson

Education, New York.

Tam, C., Oliveira, T., 2016. Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual per-

formance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61,

233–244.

Teng, S., Wei Khong, K., Wei Goh, W., Yee Loong Chong, A., 2014. Examining the

antecedents of persuasive eWOM messages in social media. Online Inf. Rev. 38 (6),

746–768.

The State of Broadband, 2016. Broadband Catalyzing Sustainable Development. http://

www.broadbandcommission.org/Documents/reports/bb-annualreport2016.pdf,

Accessed date: 12 March 2018.

Tran, H.T.T., Corner, J., 2016. The impact of communication channels on mobile banking adoption. Int. J. Bank Mark. 34 (1), 78–109.

Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M., 1996. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12 (4), 5–33.

Woodside, A.G., 2013. Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. J. Bus. Res. 66 (4), 463–472.

Weisstein, F.L., Song, L., Andersen, P., Zhu, Y., 2017. Examining impacts of negative reviews and purchase goals on consumer purchase decision. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 39, 201–207.

Wessels, L., Drennan, J., 2010. An investigation of consumer acceptance of M-banking. Int. J. Bank Mark. 28 (7), 547–568.

Yang, S., 2016. Role of transfer-based and performance-based cues on initial trust in mobile shopping services: a cross-environment perspective. Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag. 14 (1), 47–70.

Yang, K., Li, X., Kim, H., Kim, Y.H., 2015. Social shopping website quality attributes increasing consumer participation, positive eWOM, and co-shopping: the re- ciprocating role of participation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 24, 1–9.

Yin, D., Mitra, S., Zhang, H., 2016. Research note-When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inf. Syst. Res. 27 (1), 131–144.

Yu, C.S., 2012. Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 13 (2), 104–121.

Zhang, J.Q., Craciun, G., Shin, D., 2010. When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. J. Bus. Res. 63 (12), 1336–1341.

Zhang, L., Wu, L., Mattila, A.S., 2016. Online reviews: the role of information load and peripheral factors. J. Travel Res. 55 (3), 299–310.

Zhang, T., Abound Omran, B., Cobanoglu, C., 2017. Generation Y’s positive and negative eWOM: use of social media and mobile technology. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 29 (2), 732–761.

Zhou, T., 2012. Understanding users’ initial trust in mobile banking: an elaboration likelihood perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28 (4), 1518–1525.

Zhang, Y., 1996. Chinese consumers’ evaluation of foreign products: the influence of culture, product types and product presentation format. Eur. J. Market. 30 (12), 50–68.

Zhou, T., Lu, Y., Wang, B., 2010. Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26 (4), 760–767.

Zhu, F., Zhang, X., 2010. Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: the moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Mark. 74 (2), 133–148.