Six Principles for Governing Mobile Platforms

Référence :  Manner J., Nienaber D., Schermann M., Kremar H. (2013) « Six Principles for Governing Mobile Platforms » in : 11th International Conference on Wirtmanschaftsinformatik, Leipzig Germany February 27th – March 1st, 2013

Idée dominante : Les fournisseurs de plateformes mobiles suivent différents types de mécanismes de gouvernance pour attirer les consommateurs et les développeurs.

Résumé :

Pour réguler cette plateformes et ces parties prenantes un cadre dit de gouvernance de plateforme est mise en avant et est définie comme la structure, le pouvoir, les processus et les mécanismes de contrôle qui sont appliqués par le propriétaire de la plateforme pour atteindre son objectif.

Trois niveaux de gouvernance de plateformes mobiles sont mis en avant:

Le premier niveau est la structure du marché sur lesquels différentes dimensions apparaissent : légale, technique, socio-économique, concurrentielle et les parties prenantes.

Le second élément est la politique de gouvernance adoptée par la plateforme qui recouvre sept dimensions (ou politiques) : la standardisation, l’incitation, le légal, la qualité de service, la distribution, le financier, et la sécurité. Le but est d’avoir ces dimensions de la politique de gouvernance qui soient en cohérence avec la structure du marché.

Enfin le troisième élément est la configuration de la gouvernance qui définit les différents mécanismes de contrôle et mécanismes de gouvernance. Les mécanismes de gouvernance sont ceux utilisés pour mettre en place une politique de gouvernance. Ces mécanismes peuvent être basés sur l’autorité, le contrat ou la confiance. Les mécanismes de contrôle donne des informations sur l’efficacité des mécanismes de gouvernance et peuvent être basés selon quatre éléments : l’input, l’output, le comportement ou le social.

Les auteurs proposent alors six principes pour gouverner les plateformes mobiles :
1) Prendre en considération chacun des 3 niveaux de gouvernance
2) Etre proactif pour assurer la viabilité de la plateforme qui est dynamique
3) Adapter les politiques aux changements des structures de marché.
4) Constamment avoir une gouvernance alignée avec les mécanismes de contrôle
5) Renforcer les objectifs de profitabilité par une gouvernance autoritaire et un contrôle formel
6) Assister le contrôle formel avec du contrôle informel.

Notes d’intérêt : Intérêt de cette recherche et qu’elle donne un premier cadre théorique avec plusieurs typologies sur lesquelles les plateformes peuvent se référer pour développer leur gouvernance.

Références bibliographiques :

1. Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Finkelstein, A.: Business Network Management as a Survival Strategy: A Tale of Two Software Ecosystems. In: Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Finkels- tein, A., Bosch, J. (eds.): IWSECO 2009. CEUR-WS.org, Vol. 505, pp. 34-48, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2009)

2. Iyer, B., Lee, C.-H., Venkatramen, N.: Monitoring Platform Emergence: Guidelines from Software Networks. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 19, 1-13 (2007)

3. Gawer, A., Henderson, R.: Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Mar- kets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16, 1-34 (2007)

4. Basole, R. C., Karla, J.: Entwicklung von Mobile-Platform-Ecosystem-Strukturen und – Strategien. Wirtschaftsinformatik 53, 301-311 (2011)

5. Economides, N., Katsamakas, E.: Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science 52, 1057-1071 (2006)

6. Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J.: Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the Euro- pean Economic Association 1, 990-1029 (2003)

7. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Ar- chitecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Information Systems Research 21, 1-23 (2010)

8. Manner, J., Nienaber, D., Schermann, M., Krcmar, H.: Governance for mobile service plat- forms: A literature review and research agenda. ICMB 2012. AIS, Delft, NL (2012)

9. Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal 23 (2), 173-192 (2013)

10. Burkard, C., Widjaja, T., Buxmann, P.: Software Ecosystems. Wirtschaftsinformatik 54, 43-47 (2012)

11. Haaker, T., Faber, E., Bouwman, H.: Balancing customer and network value in business models for mobile services. International Journal of Mobile Communications 4, 645-661 (2006)

12. Ballon, P., Walravens, N., Spedalieri, A., Venezia, C.: The reconfiguration of mobile ser- vice provision: towards platform business models. In: 19th ITS European Regional Confer- ence, Rome, Italy (2008)

13. Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Micro-Strategizing in Platform Ecosystems: A Multiple Case Study. In: ICIS 2011 Proceedings, Shanghai (2011)

14. Kouris, I., Kleer, R.: Business models in two-sided markets: an assessment of strategies for app platforms. In: ICMB 2012. AIS, Delft, NL (2012)

15. Holzer, A., Ondrus, J.: Trends in Mobile Application Development. In: Hesselman, C., Giannelli, C. (eds.): Mobile Wireless Middleware, Operating Systems, and Applications- Workshops. Vol. 12, pp. 55-64. Springer, Berlin (2009)

16. Rudmark, D., Ghazawneh, A.: Third-Party Development for Multi-Contextual Services: On the Mechanisms of Control. In: European Conference on Information Systems (2011)

17. Brousseau, E., Penard, T.: The Economics of Digital Business Models: A Framework for Analyzing the Economics of Platforms. Review of Network Economics 6, 81-114 (2007)

18. De Reuver, M., Bouwman, H.: Governance mechanisms for mobile service innovation in value networks. Journal of Business Research 65, 347-354 (2011)

19. Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Governing third-party development through platform boundary resources. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings, Vol. 48, St. Louis (2010)

20. Jain, A.: Apps Marketplaces and the telecom value chain. IEEE Wireless Communications 18 (4), 4-5 (2011)

21. Bouwman, H., Haaker, T., Faber, E.: Developing Mobile Services: Balancing Customer and Network Value. In: The Second IEEE International Workshop on Mobile Commerce and Services, pp. 21-31, Munich (2005)

22. Grover, V., Ayyagari, R., Gokhale, R., Lim, J., Coffey, J.: A Citation Analysis of the Evo- lution and State of Information Systems within a Constellation of Reference. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7, 270-325 (2006)

23. Caillaud, B., Jullien, B.: Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Pro- viders. RAND Journal of Economics 34 (2), 309-328 (2003)

24. Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., van Alstyne, M.W.: Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard business review 84 (2006)

25. West, J.: How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strate- gies. Research Policy 32, 1259-1285 (2003)

26. Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Dynamic Structures of Control and Generativity in Digital Ecosystem Service Innovation: The Cases of the Apple and Google Mobile App Stores. LSE, London Report 44, 1-25 (2011)

27. Busquets, J.: Orchestrating Smart Business Network dynamics for innovation. European Journal of Information Systems 19, 481-493 (2010)

28. West, J., O’Mahony, S.: The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Industry and Innovation 15, 145-168 (2008)

29. Kotler, P., Keller, K.L., Brady, M., Goodman, M., Hansen, T.: Marketing Management: European Edition. Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK (2009)

30. Hagiu, A.: Multi-sided platforms: From microfoundations to design and expansion strate- gies. pp. 1-26. Harvard Business School, Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper (2009)

31. De Reuver, M., Visser, A., Prieto, G., Bouwman, H.: Governance of flexible mobile ser- vice platforms. Intelligence in Next Generation Networks 1-6 (2010)

32. Neumann, D.: Market Engineering: A Structured Design Process for Electronic Markets. UVB, Karlsruhe (2007)

33. Methlie, L.B., Pedersen, P.E.: Business model choices for value creation of mobile ser- vices. Info 9 (5), 70-85 (2007)

34. Müller, R.M., Kijl, B., Martens, J.K.J.: A Comparison of Inter-Organizational Business Models of Mobile App Stores: There is more than Open vs. Closed. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 6, 63-76 (2011)

35. Tee, R., Gawer, A.: Industry architecture as a determinant of successful platform strate- gies: a case study of the i-mode mobile Internet service. European Management Review 6, 217-232 (2009)
36. Ouchi, W.G.: A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mecha- nisms. Management science 25, 833-848 (1979)

37. Kirsch, L.S.: Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Information Systems Research 8, 215-239 (1997)

38. Cardinal, L.B., Sitkin, S.B., Long, C.P.: A configurational theory of control. In: Sitkin, S., Cardinal, L.B., Bijilsma-Frankema, K. (eds.): Control in Organizations: New Directions in Theory and Research, pp. 51-107. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

39. Schermann, M., Wiesche, M., Krcmar, H.: The Role of Information Systems in Supporting Exploitative and Exploratory Management Control Activities. Journal of Management Ac- counting Research (to appear) 24, 1-42 (2012)

40. Davies, C.: Apple privacy changes could impact 1000s of apps. In: Nguyen, V. (ed.): Slashgear, Vol. 2012. Slashgear, http://www.slashgear.com/apple-privacy-changes-could- impact-1000s-of-apps-16213785/ (2012)

41. Lunden, I.: Google Now Playing At Apple’s Game For In-App Payments? No, Just Busi- ness As Usual, Says Google. In: Butcher, M. (ed.): Techcrunch, Vol. 2012. http:// techcrunch.com, http://techcrunch.com/2012/03/09/google-now-playing-at-apples-game- for-in-app-payments-no-just-business-as-usual-says-google/ (2012)

42. Bowers, T.: App developers getting extra incentives from Microsoft. In: Hiner, J. (ed.): TechRepublic, Vol. 2012. TechRepublic, http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/career/app- developers-getting-extra-incentives-from-microsoft/4183 (2012)

43. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA (2009)